## Introduction

When most people think of a maze, they visualize the top view of a 2-dimensional, square maze with black lines on a white background as you can often find in newspapers.

Such mazes are the most basic mazes, but there are in fact all sorts of mazes. In this article we’ll provide a comprehensive exploration of various maze types, delving into their characteristics, complexities, and strategies for navigation.

## What are the types of mazes?

Below you’ll find a list of different types of mazes.

### Perfect mazes

These maze types have a single solution and no loops or inaccessible areas. An example could be a traditional grid-based maze found in puzzle books, where every junction connects uniquely to ensure a clear path. The lack of loops or unreachable points simplifies navigation, making a systematic approach like the “right-hand rule”, also known as wall-following, effective for solving.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **The larger a perfect mazes is, the larger the number of possibilities and pathways there are, and thus the more complex the maze will be for the player to solve. Larger mazes require a systematic approach to explore all potential paths.

** Possible strategies to solve perfect mazes – **Think of using systematic methods such as “wall-following” or graph-based algorithms such as depth-first search (DFS) or breadth-first search (BFS) for pathfinding can efficiently explore potential routes.

## Multi-state mazes

Multi-state mazes change over time or with certain conditions. An example might involve escape room puzzles where solving one clue triggers the alteration of paths or walls. Another more simple example would be a digital, multi-state maze that changes form when time passes.

The complexity of multi-state mazes lies in adapting to changing environments and anticipating transformations.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **The unpredictability of changes and their triggers can complicate navigation through multi-state mazes.

** Possible strategies to solve multi-state mazes – **Employing adaptive algorithms like reinforcement learning or predictive models to anticipate changes based on observed patterns and actions can aid in navigating through dynamic environments efficiently.

## Blind mazes

Blind mazes contain concealed sections that make solving them more difficult. Imagine a digital, 2-dimensional maze with a circle of specifiec diameter around the player. Everything inside the circle will be visible for the player, while areas outside are covered in dark. The lack of a full overview of the mazes complicates strategy planning and makes solving such mazes more difficult.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **Relying on non-visual cues or tactile feedback might lead to potential errors in navigation.

** Possible strategies to solve blind mazes- **Implementing memory-based strategies or algorithms like recursive backtracking to systematically explore covered areas and build a mental map for effective navigation.

## Arrow mazes

These mazes contain directional signs at junctions which dictate your movement. An example would a maze that has arrows at intersections which specify which direction your next move must be at that intersection.

These added directional cues increase the complexity by limiting your freedom of movement within the maze. In other words, you have less options for planning your route through the maze.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **Over-reliance on directional cues might lead to missed alternative paths.

** Possible strategies to solve arrow mazes – **Balancing adherence to directional signs with algorithms like Dijkstra’s or A* for determining alternative routes and efficiently navigating through the maze.

## Directional mazes

Directional mazes specify directions like “left-only” or “right-only” at intersections, thus, restricting your movements. A maze might permit only left turns at junctions. This limitation increases complexity by reducing navigational choices.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **The restrictive nature of directional constraints requires strict adherence, leaving minimal room for error.

** Possible strategies to solve directional mazes – **Employing modified pathfinding algorithms or rule-based systems to comply strictly with specified directions, such as Tremaux’s algorithm or path constraint solvers.

## Line mazes

These mazes feature paths drawn by only a line instead of a ‘corridor-like’ path with walls. As the player, you then need to follow a designated line. The absence of walls eliminates traditional wall-following strategies, demanding precision to stay on the line. For example, you can’t use the simple and well-known ‘wall-following’ algorithm to solve the maze, as there are no walls.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **slightly more complex than a regular maze with walls, as you have at least one algorithm less at your disposal (i.e., you can’t use the wall-following algorithm).

** Possible strategies to solve line mazes – **Use a strategy other than the wall-following algorithm.

## Reactive mazes

Reactive maze are maze that alter themselves based on actions of the player. For example, an interactive digital maze might change paths or solutions based on the player’s decisions. The maze’s adaptability in response to actions significantly increases its complexity.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **Predicting alterations becomes challenging due to the maze’s dynamic nature.

** Possible strategies to solve reactive mazes – **Memorize what changes occur with your decisions, then adapt your strategy accordingly. If, on the other hand, the maze’s changes are completely random and different each time, then, well…. Best of luck to you in solving these mazes as it all depends on luck then :p.

## Weave mazes

Weave mazes have their paths intertwine, adding another dimension. Think of a maze with over/under pathways like weaving patterns on paper. The complexity arises from managing the intertwined paths and making decisions at intersection points.

** What makes these mazes complex? – **The weaving of paths can lead to potential confusion at intersections.

**Possible strategies to solve weaving mazes – **You can basically use the same types of strategies to solve such mazes as you’d do with regular, perfect mazes.

## Mirror mazes

Mirrors create the illusion of multiple paths. Navigating through the mazes that contain mirrors requires handling visual confusion caused by reflections. An example is a maze constructed with mirrors, generating multiple apparent routes.

You can usually find these mazes in real-life constructed in theme parks or in 3-dimensional videogames.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **Visual illusions challenge spatial reasoning and perception, making distinguishing real paths from reflections difficult. They can also cause confusion, which makes finding the correct path more difficult.

** Possible strategies to solve mirror mazes – **Utilizing angle of reflection = angle of incidence principles or algorithms for optical illusions to deduce actual paths and navigate effectively.

## Tilted mazes

In a tilted maze, you navigate the maze by having to tilt the maze to move in your chosen directions. A tilted mazes is in fact similar to a regular maze on paper that you need to solve by hand or draw a line through with a pen, but the tilted maze in this case would be a tangible product that you hold in your hands.

An example would be a cardboard with upright walls that together form a tangible maze, and a ball that you need to guide through the maze by tilting the maze to move the ball in the direction of your choice.

In a tangible case, such as described above, the complexity is actually low, since the maze can not be created larger than a certain size (it simply won’t fit in your hands otherwise).

In an intangible case, such as a game that features a 3-dimensional, tilted maze, size is not so much of an issue. The maze in this case could be any size, since you view the maze on a screen. In this case, zooming in and out can solve the constraint of size.

An example of a digital, 3-dimensional tilted maze would be any of the tilted mazes on the app stores for your mobile phone.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **The complexity of a tilted mazes lies more in the fact that you need to have fine, motoric skills to tilt the maze properly, whether that’s a real-life, tangible maze in the form of a cardboard, or your phone with it’s gyroscope sensors that monitor the tilt of your phone.

** Possible strategies to solve tilted mazes – **As you need your hands to tilt the maze, whether it’s a tangible game or a 3-dimensional game on your phone, the only strategy at your disposable is visual inspection of the maze while tilting the board to navigate the ball through it.

## Tilting mazes

Tilting mazes, on the other hand, featuring moving or tilting surfaces. As the surface changes, the maze layout continuously shifts. Think of such a maze as a conventional maze but with multiple layers or floors, where at certain areas the surface of the cell that you’re on can move up or down, bringing you onto the upper or lower surface.

It’s basically a 3-dimensional maze, where you need to navigate left/right, forward/back, and up/down.

**What makes these mazes complex? – **the complexity of a tilting maze lies in the fact that the total surface area of the maze is much larger than a 2-dimensional maze with the same length and width, since we now also have the height of the maze, or rather, the number of floors or vertical surfaces of the maze, that we need to navigate through.

** Possible strategies to solve tilting mazes – **a strategy for solving tilting mazes is to redraw the total surface area of all the floors of the maze as one, flat floor, then use any of the regular algorithms for solving conventional, 2-dimensional mazes, such as ‘wall-following’.

# Conclusion

Hopefully you’ve gained some insight into different kinds of mazes with this article. The most common maze you might stumble upon in general, whether that’s in the back of a newspaper, in puzzle books, or in mobile games, is the conventional, perfect maze in one shape or another with easy to medium complexity (which, in the case of the ‘perfect maze’, the complexity is defined by the size of the maze where the larger the maze is, the more complex it is considered to be).

The more complex or difficult types of mazes, such as the reactive maze, can be interesting, but if it’s too hard to solve then there is no incentive to play the maze for too long. After all, I believe that games and riddles should be challenging, but also solvable… because in the end, it still is a game and its purpose is providing entertainment or relaxation, and not to mentally stress you too much.

In the mobile game Mazy Maze that I’m developing, I’m aiming to create a game that increases each maze’s complexity as you advance through the levels, but I’m trying to find a balance between fun/entertainment and difficulty.

The ultimate goal of Mazy Maze is to give you a pleasant, fun, and somewhat challenging gaming experience, and for that, I’m trying to find the perfect balance between difficulty and solvability of the mazes.

Which types of mazes have you played and which ones do you favor? What kind of maze did you find the most fun kind of maze to play? Let me know in the comments below :).

## Leave a Reply